We Asked, You Said, We Did

We asked for your views on the policy proposals for the Care Leaver Payment. This included questions on the intention of the payment, the proposed eligibility criteria of the payment, the application process and what support is required when applying for and after receiving the payment.

The consultation closed on 26 January 2024 and 80 responses were received, including 32 individual responses and 28 organisational responses. These have been published on the consultation hub.

An independent analysis has been commissioned by the Scottish Government and is currently underway. The analysis report will be published in Spring 2024.

The responses, along with reports from engagement events during the consultation period, will inform the policy development of the proposed payment.

We asked for views on two minor amendments to road works legislation. Firstly,  on the proposal to revoke the Scottish Statutory Instrument,  “The “Scottish Road Works Register (Prescribed Fees) Regulations 2022” and replace it with a new Regulation to account for the overall running cost in the 2024/25 and secondly, Secondly, we sought views on amending “The Road Works (Qualifications of Operative and Supervisors (Scotland) Regulations 2017”, and the Road Works (Reinstatement Quality Plans, Qualifications of Supervisors and Operative and Miscellaneous Amendments) (Scotland) Regulations 2023, by expanding the list of approved awarding organisations to include two additional bodies, “Highfield Qualifications” and “EUIAS ”

In total, thirteen responses to the consultation were received, primarily from roads authorities. One response was received from an individual, seven from local authority roads teams, four from statutory undertakers and one from a public body responsible for the regulation of road works in Scotland. Brief analysis of these responses is detailed below:

There was strong support for both proposals; ten of the thirteen responses gave full support for the proposal on Fees. One roads authority noted no objection or preference, and two statutory undertakers objected to the current splitting mechanism. Of the two undertaker responses in opposition to the proposal, one made no alternate suggestions, but noted that undertakers appear to be paying more than roads authorities generally. However as the mechanism is use based, and at present utility firms undertake 75% of works, this is to be expected. Another undertaker suggested a new splitting model for future years in addition to opposing the current one. Twelve of the thirteen responses gave no objection to the addition of two new awarding bodies in road works training for Scotland, with one response skipping the question. One comment was received caveating their ‘no objection’ response,  on the condition that the bodies in question meet the relevant standards

The consultation responses have been carefully considered, most of the respondents supported the proposal to replace the 2022 Scottish Statutory Instrument. As a result, we will now revoke the Scottish Statutory Instrument, “The “Scottish Road Works Register (Prescribed Fees) Regulations 2022”, and replace it with a new Regulation as proposed. We have also added the two new awarding bodies, “Highfield Qualfications” and “EUIAS” to the appropriate statute. We have passed on the single request for a new apportionment model for fees and amounts with the Roads Authority and Utility Committee (Scotland), as the industry body representing the road works community. We have advised that if the group wish to review, amend or replace their current proposed splitting mechanism, comment must be returned to Transport Scotland by September 2024, to allow for sufficient consultation ahead of the next financial year.

We asked your views on SSSC’s proposals to streamline and improve registration. In order to achieve this, we asked your views on reducing the number of Register parts from 23 to 4, requiring employees to apply for registration within three months of starting a new role and be registered within six months. We also asked about SSSC’s proposals to include more information on the public facing Register, such as specialist qualifications for social workers, and information relating to fitness to practise which is currently available on a different parts of the SSSC website. The consultation opened on 4 October 2023 and closed on 2 January 2024.

A total of 69 responses were received; of these, 53 were from individuals and 16 were from organisations. 

The vast majority of respondents were supportive of the proposals, with many highlighting that reducing the number of register parts will help improve the process of registering with the SSSC. 87% of respondents agreed with this proposal, with 77% agreeing with the proposals to reduce the timescales for applying and 77% also agreeing with the proposals to include more information on the public facing Register.

There were also some respondents who had some concerns with certain aspects of the proposals. Several respondents highlighted that they believed 3 months was too short a timescale to expect a worker to apply for registration and others believing that sharing additional information on the public facing register could have a negative impact on individuals.

A full analysis of the consultation is available on the Scottish Government website.

The Scottish Government intends to implement the proposals set out in the consultation by amending Regulation of Care (Social Service Workers) (Scotland) Order 2005, The Scottish Social Services Council (Appointments, Procedure and Access to the Register) Regulations 2001 and The Registration of Social Workers and Social Care Workers in Care Services (Scotland) Regulations 2013. More information is available on the Scottish Parliament Website.

We asked for your views on whether Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) should be continued as part of the range of policy measures in place to address alcohol related harm, and, in the event of its continuation, the level the minimum unit price should be set going forward. The consultation opened on 20 September 2023 and closed on 22 November 2023. We asked for your views on whether Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) should be continued as part of the range of policy measures in place to address alcohol related harm, and, in the event of its continuation, the level the minimum unit price should be set going forward. The consultation opened on 20 September 2023 and closed on 22 November 2023.

We received 545 responses to our consultation questions. These included responses from 432 individuals and 113 organisations. Respondents included public health organisations, alcohol industry representative bodies and alcohol producers.

Two fifths of all respondents (39%) supported MUP continuing, three fifths (59%) were opposed, and 2% did not answer. There were, however, significant differences between individuals and organisations. Just over one quarter (27%) of individuals supported MUP continuing, compared to nine in ten (88%) organisations. All public health organisations who responded to the consultation agreed MUP should continue; however, 83% of alcohol industry representative bodies and 60% of alcohol producers were opposed.

One third of respondents (32%) agreed with the proposed minimum unit price of 65 pence. Two thirds (66%) disagreed, and 2% did not answer. Individuals and organisations held almost exactly opposing views. While 79% of individuals disagreed and 19% agreed, among organisations 79% agreed and 17% disagreed.

Most respondents held firm views either for or against MUP. One third (32%) supported a continuation and a price increase, while three fifths (59%) opposed both proposals. However, 7% were in favour of MUP continuing, but opposed to the specified price.

A full analysis of the consultation can be found on the Scottish Government website.

The Scottish Government is grateful to those who took the time to provide a response to this consultation. The consultation analysis report has now been published, along with the individual/organisation responses (where permission was granted). We have also provided feedback which can be read on the Scottish Government’s website. Following extensive evaluation, the evidence supports that MUP has had a positive impact on health outcomes, namely a reduction in alcohol-attributable deaths and hospital admissions, particularly in men and those living in the most deprived areas, and therefore contributes to addressing alcohol-related health inequalities. It is our intention to lay draft orders before Parliament to continue minimum unit pricing beyond 30^th April, and to set the price per unit at 65 pence.

We sought views to inform a review of the Scottish Government’s National Islands Plan published in December 2019. The consultation opened on 18 July and closed on 7 November 2023.

The consultation received 167 responses submitted by 39 organisations and 128 individuals. Most respondents (82%) said they were permanent island residents. In addition, a total of 231 individuals participated in consultation workshops (13 in-person on islands and 3 online) delivered by the Scottish Government’s Islands Team.

There were mixed views, both among organisations and individuals, about whether the National Islands Plan had had any effect on their lives, with organisations (50%) more likely than individuals (10%) to say the plan affected them positively.

There were also mixed views on the contents of the current National Islands Plan, with 37% of respondents saying they had positive views, 36% saying they had negative views and 27% saying they had no views at all.

A large majority of respondents wanted to see a new (or revised) National Islands Plan.

The Scottish Government will commence work to develop a second National Islands Plan, to be published in 2025. The new document will be informed by the feedback received through this public consultation as well as close collaboration with island communities, island local authorities and delivery partners. We will continue the implementation of the commitments set out in the current plan whilst the new document is developed.

We asked for your views on draft regulations to add the Transport Tribunal to schedule 1 of the Tribunals (Scotland) Act 2014, and to transfer certain appeal functions of the Transport Tribunal under section 39 of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2001 to the Upper Tribunal for Scotland. In addition, we asked for your views on draft regulations allocating functions relating to appeals in connection with bus services improvement partnerships to the Upper Tribunal for Scotland. Finally, we asked for your views on draft regulations setting out rules regarding composition and procedure to be followed by the Upper Tribunal when dealing with these appeals. We asked for your views on draft regulations to add the Transport Tribunal to schedule 1 of the Tribunals (Scotland) Act 2014, and to transfer certain appeal functions of the Transport Tribunal under section 39 of the Transport (Scotland) Act 2001 to the Upper Tribunal for Scotland. In addition, we asked for your views on draft regulations allocating functions relating to appeals in connection with bus services improvement partnerships to the Upper Tribunal for Scotland. Finally, we asked for your views on draft regulations setting out rules regarding composition and procedure to be followed by the Upper Tribunal when dealing with these appeals.

We received a total of five responses from individuals and organisations (the organisations being local transport authorities). One respondent was content for their response to be published with their name. Two were content for their responses to be published anonymously, and the remaining two did not wish for their responses to be published.

The majority of respondents were content with the provisions. The main concerns have been addressed in the analysis of consultation responses document. Some responses commented more generally on local transport provision, which was outside of the scope of the consultation.

The Scottish Government would like to thank everyone who took the time to provide a response to this consultation. We have published the non-confidential responses to the consultation and an analysis of the consultation responses (link below). We have carefully considered all of the comments provided and the responses have informed the draft regulations. We will lay the suite of draft regulations described in the preceding paragraph in the Scottish Parliament later this year. If passed, the described appeal functions outlined above will be allocated to the Upper Tribunal for Scotland.

On 29 September 2023, the Scottish Government launched a questionnaire asking private and social rented sector landlords and tenants questions on rental sector reform to inform development of legislation to deliver A New Deal for Tenants through a Housing Bill in this parliamentary year. The questionnaire was accompanied by a paper on the current proposals, which is available on the Scottish Government website.

The questionnaire closed on 27 October 2023 and in total 6,650 questionnaire responses were available for analysis. The largest respondent groups were PRS landlords, accounting for 44% of respondents, and PRS tenants, accounting for 29% of respondents. Other points to note are that:

• 48% of all respondents came from the four groups with a landlord perspective (PRS landlord, PRS landlord organisation, SRS landlord and SRS landlord organisation).
• 33% of all respondents came from the four groups with a tenant perspective (PRS tenant, PRS tenant organisation, SRS tenant and SRS tenant organisation).

Overall the analysis demonstrates that there are a variety of views on proposals for rented sector reform, with respondents in general agreement on a number of issues, and divided on others. More generally, feedback on the questionnaire included concerns that the closed question only format did not allow for a nuanced response and did not allow stakeholders to provide further information or commentary.

The Scottish Government is grateful to those who took the time to provide a response to this questionnaire. The analysis report has now been published, and we have also published a separate report with analysis of email responses received in relation to the matters covered in the questionnaire. Where consent has been given to publish responses from organisations these can be viewed here. 

We have carefully considered the wide range of views expressed and sought to incorporate findings into the final policy proposals. The Scottish Government intends to implement these proposals to deliver a New Deal for Tenants by introducing a Housing Bill to Parliament in this parliamentary year.

The public consultation sought views on the proposed implementation of mandatory training on planning for elected members. The implementation of mandatory training was set out in the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 as part of a package of measures for the planning system. Once we implement these measures, elected members will be prohibited from carrying out certain planning functions if they have not completed the required training.

120 responses were received, of which 77 were from groups or organisations and 43 from individual members of the public.

An independent analysis of responses to the consultation has been undertaken and can be viewed at: Planning system - mandatory training for elected members: consultation analysis - gov.scot (www.gov.scot). We are currently considering the responses to the consultation and will provide an update on next steps in due course.

Where permission to publish has been provided, the consultation responses are now available to view online.

We asked for views on proposed increases to the building warrant fees required to deliver change to strengthen the building standards system and also the development of a new building warrant fees model in Scotland. The consultation formed part of the work undertaken by the Verification Delivery Model work stream which is one of the seven work streams being directed by the Building Standards Futures Board. The Building Standards Futures Board was set up to provide guidance and direction on the development and implementation of the recommendations made by expert Review Panels in the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire and construction failings in public buildings in Scotland.

We asked for your views on an increase in building warrant fees to support verifiers to deliver a strengthened and improved building standards service in Scotland. We also sought views on increased fees specifically for new and enhanced verification requirements for High Risk Buildings, to support the Building Standards Hub, enhanced Scottish Government Building Standards Division (BSD) monitoring and auditing and if the local authority Building Standards enforcement role should be funded by building warrant fees. We also asked for your views on whether or not fees should be devolved or set nationally to assist in informing future policy considerations.

In total, 95 consultation responses were received from 39 individuals and 56 organisations. There was widespread consensus and agreement to all the proposals put forward, excluding questions 3.1 and 3.2. The majority of respondents agreed to an increase in building warrant fees (65%) and to using a proportion of fees to support a national Building Standards Hub (70%).

81% of respondents supported the introduction of an enhanced fee for High Risk Buildings (HRB) due to the increased complex nature of a HRB warrant applications and the need for improved verification and oversight capabilities of such buildings and applications.

There was widespread consensus (88%) that building warrant fees should be set at a national level.

While many believed there would be no impact on people with protected characteristics or on socio-economic inequalities, respondents suggested the proposals could increase the financial burden on individuals and businesses wishing to undertake building work and increase the workload for building services.

The Scottish Government will increase building warrant fees from 01 April 2024. The national Building Standards Hub, launching in May 2024, will also be funded through an increase to building warrant fees.

Work will continue through the Compliance Plan work stream to introduce an enhanced compliance plan process for High Risk Building (HRB), with the intention of introducing a corresponding enhanced verification fee for HRBs. 

Through the Verity House agreement, the Scottish Government will continue discussions with CoSLA and other key stakeholders on any potential future devolution of building warrant fees.

It is not the current intention of the Scottish Government to fund the statutory building standards services through building warrant fees. We will continue to engage with stakeholders through our Working Groups on this.

The consultation analysis report can be found on the Scottish Government website: Building warrant fees: consultation analysis - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)

The consultation outcome report can be found on the Scottish Government website: Building warrant fees: consultation outcome report - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)

We sought views on proposals to close fishing to sandeel in all Scottish waters, with the purpose of bringing about wider environmental and ecosystem benefits. The consultation opened on 21 July and closed on 13 October 2023.

The consultation sought views of six questions covering support for the preferred option to close fishing for sandeel in all Scottish waters, alternative or complementary measures that could be considered, the scientific evidence underpinning the proposals, and questions relating to the statutory impact assessments (for example, Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment, Strategic Environmental Assessment and Island Communities Impact Assessment).

A total of 494 written representations were received, comprising of 443 individuals and 51 organisations including the fishing sector, renewable energy developers and recreational interests. There were also 9,815 campaign submissions.

The responses covered a range of issues, including questions on the scientific evidence base on the potential effects of sandeel fisheries management on the marine environment and the applicability of alternative measures. Recurring issues or themes raised in the comments also included issues relating to the UK-EU trade and cooperation agreement, benefits for biodiversity, wellbeing and wildlife.

Overall, the analysis demonstrated that there was overwhelming support (97%) for the preferred option to close fishing for sandeel in all Scottish waters.

An independent analysis of the consultation responses is available on the Scottish Government website. Submitted responses have also been published where permission has been given.

The Scottish Government is grateful to those who took the time to provide a response to the consultation.

Following careful consideration of all responses and representations received and the available scientific evidence, the Scottish Government intends to proceed with the proposals to close fishing for sandeel in all Scottish waters. In reaching this decision, the Scottish Government has applied the precautionary principle to its decision making and ensured alignment with national and international commitments.

The Sandeel (Prohibition Of Fishing) (Scotland) Order 2024 was laid in the Scottish Parliament on 5 February 2024 and will come into force on 26 March 2024. The Order will cover all Scottish waters including that part of the UK’s exclusive economic zone adjacent to Scotland and, will apply to all vessels fishing in these waters.

The Scottish Government has published its response to the consultation analysis report.

We sought views on proposals for a Human Rights Bill for Scotland. The consultation opened on 15 June and closed on 5 October 2023. The questions solicited views on the following areas: 

• Incorporating the Treaty Rights 

• Recognising the Right to a Healthy Environment 

• Incorporating Further Rights and Embedding Equality 

• The Duties 

• Ensuring Access to Justice for Rights-Holders 

• Implementing the New Scottish Human Rights Act  

A total of 397 responses were received, 277 of which were submitted through Citizen Space and 120 were sent via email. 66% of respondents were organisations and 34% were individuals.  

The Scottish Government also held seven public consultation events with over 150 attendees.  

An independent analysis of the consultation responses has been published, as well as an Easy Read version.  Together Scotland have also produced a child-friendly version of the analysis report. 

Overall the analysis demonstrates that there is strong support for our efforts to bring more internationally recognised human rights into Scotland’s domestic legal framework. However, there was challenge from some respondents on various elements of the proposals and our plans for effective Bill implementation.  

The Scottish Government is grateful to those who took the time to provide a response to this consultation. We are carefully considering the results of the independent analysis to help inform the development of the Human Rights Bill which will be introduced during the 2023-24 parliamentary year. The Bill will be accompanied by a Policy Memorandum upon its introduction to the Scottish Parliament, which will set out how we have taken into account responses to the consultation in development of the Bill. The responses will also provide useful feedback and evidence for the associated Bill impact assessments.  

Our Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill consultation sought views on wildlife management and the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill ("the Bill").  It was set out in 2 parts, relating to the use of snares and cable restraints in Scotland and relating to the powers of Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (“Scottish SPCA”) inspectors.  The consultation opened on 22 August 2023 and closed on 3 October 2023.

We received 5,289 responses to our consultation questions. These included responses from 79 organisations and 5,210 individuals. Respondents included animal welfare organisations, land management organisations, sporting organisations, conservation organisations, pest controllers and public bodies.

Respondents were generally supportive of the proposal to prohibit the use of snares to take or kill wild animals in Scotland, and to provide individually appointed Scottish SPCA inspectors with additional powers to aid in their investigations relating to wildlife crime.

A full analysis of the consultation is available on the Scottish Government website.

The Scottish Government intends to implement the proposals set out in the consultation to ban the use of snares and extend the powers of Scottish SPCA inspectors, by amending the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill at Stage 2.  More information is available on the Scottish Parliament website.

Since 2001, a specific area in the Firth of Clyde has been closed to fishing each year between 14 February and 30 April, in order to protect spawning cod. The Scottish Government has responsibility for the closure via a Scottish Statutory Instrument (SSI). Prior to 2022 exemptions were provided for Norway lobster trawlers, creels and scallop dredgers due to the low amounts of cod that they catch. Since 2022, no exemptions have been in place. This is due to scientific evidence suggesting that any activity occurring within 10m of the seabed has the potential to impact on spawning.

We consulted to seek your views on continuing the closure in 2024 and 2025.

We received a wide array of responses ranging from removing the closure entirely, to wider fishing bans and reintroducing an inshore limit and varying levels of protection in between. Where consent has been given to publish the response these can be viewed here.

Measures to protect spawning cod in the Firth of Clyde will continue in 2024 and 2025 in the same format as 2022 and 2023. This means that there will be no exemptions for the spawning periods in 2024 or 2025.

An SSI has now been laid in Parliament and can be viewed here.

This change will have a short-term impact on local fishers given that the full closure of the fishery is for 11 weeks, but by taking action now, we hope to see the stock replenish which will ultimately be beneficial for fishing interests.

The closure will come into effect on 14 February 2024.

Whilst creels are included in the closure, provided that all creels are left open and unbaited and are not otherwise used for any fishing activity, they may be left in situ on the seabed during the period of the closure. Alternatively they may be lifted and relocated for the duration of the closure.

We asked for your views on the draft statutory guidance that will be published to support organisations meet their duties under the Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act 2019. The public consultation ran from 22 June to 19 September 2023.

A total of 77 responses were received; of these, 31 were from individuals and 46 were from organisations. There were several general themes arising, regarding the layout of the document and level of understanding, the level of detail, the specific organisations and staff included in the scope, the consequences of non-compliance and the timing of the implementation. Specific comments were also made about individual guidance chapters.

The consultation analysis report has been published, along with the individual responses (where permission was granted). We will now take all the comments and suggestions made as a result of the public consultation, along with other feedback on the statutory guidance, such as that from the testing programme and our engagement with individual organisations to produce a final version of the statutory guidance. We will involve external stakeholders in this process as appropriate. The final guidance will be published on 01 April 2024 to coincide with the commencement of the Act.

We sought views on the proposed river gradings for the 2024 salmon fishing season. The consultation opened on the 9 August and closed on 8 September 2023.

There were 37 responses submitted to the consultation which consisted of those from individuals (46%) and organisations (54%). A small proportion of respondents (14%) agreed with the proposed gradings for the 2024 salmon fishing season, 41% objected and the remainder did not express a specific view for or against the gradings. A number of respondents (35%) indicated that they believed the proposed grade assigned to a specific river was incorrect and should be changed.

A majority of respondents expressed views demanding urgent actions taken on other pressures that they felt needed to be taken now in order to better protect salmon populations. Additionally, 27% of respondents indicated that they felt a 100% catch and release policy would be more effective in protecting and restoring wild salmon populations.

The views given on the proposed river gradings have been used to inform the process of finalising the gradings for the 2024 salmon fishing season, which will be used in the annual amendment to The Conservation of Salmon (Scotland) Regulations 2016.

We have set out in the accompanying Implementation Plan to our Scottish Wild Salmon Strategy, over 60 collective actions which will contribute to further the protection and restoration of wild Atlantic salmon populations. The Wild Salmon Strategy is one component of the Scottish Government’s ambition to protect and restore Scotland's natural environment as outlined in the Environment Strategy for Scotland and the Biodiversity strategy to 2045: tackling the nature emergency.

The Wild Salmon Strategy Implementation Plan Delivery Group has been established, bringing together the organisations that will deliver the actions set out in the Implementation Plan. The role of the group is to oversee and direct delivery of the Strategy and Implementation Plan.

We asked for your opinion on the Scottish Government's proposed British Sign Language (BSL) National Plan 2023-2029.  

A total of 80 responses were received, 76 of which were submitted through Citizen Space and 4 were sent via email. A total of 43 community consultation events were held in addition to the consultation to allow BSL users to participate in a two-way dialogue in their own language and in a culturally and linguistically appropriate way to express their views. The community consultation events organised by stakeholders took place between 30 June 2023 and 3 September 2023.

The overarching themes raised by both individual and organisation respondents, as well as by BSL and non-BSL users were the following:

• Focus on clear, tangible and measurable actions
• Continuous collaboration with BSL users
• Equal opportunity and inclusion
• Promote BSL as a language and culture
• Inclusion of the whole D/deaf community

A full analysis of the consultation is available on the Scottish Government website 

The Scottish Government would like to thank everyone who took the time to provide a response to this consultation. We have taken account of the responses received and the consultation analysis report. 

The responses to this consultation have informed the final version of the British Sign Language National Plan 2023-2029

The public consultation sought views on proposed legislative changes to permitted development rights (PDR) - Phase 3, which focussed mainly on domestic and non-domestic renewables equipment, thermal efficiency improvements and electricity network infrastructure.

467 responses were received, of which 104 were from groups/organisations and 363 from members of the public.  An Independent analysis of responses.  and, where permission has been given, the consultation responses are available to view. 

The responses, together with the analysis report, have informed and shaped the Scottish Ministers' approval of the Scottish Statutory Instrument, laid before the Scottish Parliament on 28 March 2024.   

Subject to Parliamentary scrutiny, the legislative changes are intended to come into force on 24 May 2024. The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Scotland) Amendment Order 2024 (legislation.gov.uk)

The changes introduced by the Order are intended to help support:

• deployment of domestic and non-domestic renewables equipment, such as solar panels, wind turbines and heat pumps.
• alteration/replacement of windows to improve energy efficiency.
• roll-out of electricity network infrastructure.

The Scottish Government has committed to designate at least one new National Park in Scotland by the end of this Parliamentary session in 2026. A draft appraisal framework with broad selection criteria for new National Parks was published for consultation on 11 May 2023. The consultation closed on 4 August 2023. The purpose of the consultation was to obtain views, comments and feedback on the draft appraisal framework and selection criteria for new National Parks.

We received 165 responses to our consultation questions. Almost all were submitted via the Scottish Government’s online consultation platform, Citizen Space. We received responses from 132 individuals and 33 from organisations.

Responses were received from individuals, organisations, public sector bodies, those in the built environment and land management sectors and from the energy sector.

Overall, the key finding from the analysis of responses was that, with some refinement, there was widespread support for the draft appraisal framework.

Quantitative findings

Overall there was a high level of support for the seven criteria in the draft appraisal framework. All criteria were supported by more than 70% of respondents, with three criteria (meeting the special needs of the area, strategic contribution and visitor management and experience) supported by more than 90%.  Each of the 22 components of the criteria was supported by between 72% and 94% of respondents.

Qualitative findings

Noting the overall broad support for the criteria and their components, open comments highlighted a range of views and perspectives.  In several cases, respondents requested more detailed definitions of the criteria or component wording, or for more detail to be provided. There were calls from some respondents for both broader and narrower criteria, and for some, there was an appeal to prioritise certain criteria over others. 

Criterion 5 (added value) recorded the lowest level of agreement of the seven criteria.  Many who disagreed with this criterion highlighted their dislike of the term ‘added value’, often due to their interpretation of this as monetary value or financial gain. Many respondents, whether they agreed or disagreed or were unsure about the criterion, suggested that a clearer definition was necessary.  Several respondents asked for clarity about whether the criterion was intended to be financial or whether value could also speak to environmental, social or cultural heritage outcomes. 

A full analysis of the consultation has been published on the Scottish Government website.

Submitted responses have been published where permission has been given.

The Scottish Government would like to thank everyone who took the time to provide a response to this consultation.  We have taken account of the responses received and the consultation analysis report. 

The responses to this consultation have informed the final version of the appraisal framework for new National Parks which has now been published.   

In particular, we have taken action by refining the appraisal framework in the following ways:

• We have retained all of the appraisal criteria except for ‘added value’;
• We have provided guidance for groups wishing to submit a nomination for a new National Park on each of the criteria and we have provided examples of evidence and indicators that groups may wish to include; and
• We have provided detailed scoring guidance for each criterion.

The appraisal framework will be used to help assess nominations and to inform the decision of Scottish Ministers on the candidate area(s) to be designated as Scotland’s next National Park.

We asked for your opinion on the Scottish Government’s proposed policy in relation to the content of the Enforcement Regulations.

We received a total of 462 responses to the public consultation.  Of these, 16 were submitted by local authorities and 3 by Community Councils.  14 other respondents also identified their organisation, and 429 were listed as individuals.  All feedback received will help inform the content of the Enforcement Regulations.

We have published non-confidential responses to the consultation and an analysis of the consultation responses (link below).  Preparations are now underway on the Enforcement Regulations and the feedback received from this consultation will help shape that process.

Read the full analysis report.

Read the Scotland’s Pavement Parking Prohibitions - Consultation on Enforcement Regulations for Local Authorities

Our Housing to 2040 Strategy commits us to provide councils with tools and powers to support local areas to make the best use of existing housing stock. This includes managing the number of long-term empty homes, short-term lets and second homes.

We ran a joint consultation with COSLA to seek views on how local taxation can help achieve this. The consultation proposal was whether to provide additional powers to councils allowing them discretion to:

• charge up to 100% premium (double the full rate) on council tax for second homes
• charge more than 100% premium on council tax for second homes and long-term empty homes

The aim being to encourage more residential accommodation to be used as homes for living in and for these to be occupied for more of the time. As local areas need to decide how to achieve the right balance in the use of housing to meet local needs and to support thriving communities, we also asked for views on whether the current non-domestic rates thresholds for self-catering accommodation should change, and/or if councils should have discretion to set them.

The consultation ran from 17 April to 11 July 2023. In total 981 responses were received, 73 from groups or organisations and 908 from individual members of the public.

On 24 October 2023 we published a consultation report compiled by Craigforth, an independent social research company, with an analysis of these responses.

This can be viewed on the Scottish Government website at Council tax for second and empty homes, and thresholds for non-domestic rates: consultation analysis - gov.scot (www.gov.scot)

Ministers, and the Joint Working Group established with COSLA and the Green Party to consider local taxation, considered the consultation responses.

On 5 September 2023, as part of the Scottish Government's Programme for Government, it was announced that legislation would be laid at Parliament to introduce new powers that would enable councils to choose to double the full rate of council tax on second homes. This was laid on 8 November 2023 and a majority of the Scottish Parliament approved it on 13 December 2023.

From 1 April 2024 councils can decide to double the full rate of council tax on second homes. The powers also enable councils to grant a six-month ‘grace period’ from the Empty Homes Council Tax premium where new owners are undertaking repairs and renovations, which is aimed at incentivising reoccupation and improvements.

Further information about the legislation is published alongside it in a Policy Note at The Council Tax (Variation for Unoccupied Dwellings) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2023 (legislation.gov.uk)

Ministers decided not to alter the thresholds for non-domestic rates for self-catering accommodation at this time, but this is being kept under review.

The remaining aspects of the consultation proposal are still under consideration by the Joint Working Group.